Woohoo! GNOME Nautilus Has Received a Huge Speed Boost Improvement

GNOME Nautilus Screenshot

I’m not quite sure when it happened (this morning or a couple days ago), but the Ubuntu team pushed out a new update to Gutsy 7.10/GNOME 2.20.1 that drastically increased the speed of Nautilus’ file seek functionality – a big bugaboo of mine. Here’s what I mean: Previously it took Nautilus a good 5-10 seconds on my 3Ghz PC with 1GB of RAM to display my listing of 1,400 images (and growing) every time I wanted to upload an image to my website or view contents from that particular folder. Well, guess what? It now takes one second (or a matter of milliseconds) for the upload listing and a second or two for the thumbnail view when first opening the folder.

I can’t even begin to tell you how pleased I am about this update, but I can say that my productivity is going to shoot through the roof because of it. Great work Nautilus developers!

Side note: I also noticed, when in list mode for uploads (as in the above pic), that one can now toggle on/off hidden files through the right-click menu (interesting), but one still can’t right-click or double-click a file to rename or delete it like in Windows.

Popularity: 26% [?]

Tags: , , , ,


Comments

One Response to “Woohoo! GNOME Nautilus Has Received a Huge Speed Boost Improvement”

  1. Zipizape on January 15th, 2008 9:50 am

    What makes Nautilus unbearable:
    -Tools menu: too big (and can’t change the size nor configure it in any way).
    - The user is unable to paste the path of a file to go directly to its folder when asked where to save a file (like many other file browsers)
    - The user is unable to preview the contents of files within a folder when selecting where to save a document. Only in Gimp this works. Why only in Gimp??
    - It is not possible to toggle comfortably between text path and buttons path
    - The tree view says empty to a folder when it doesn’t have folders inside (why not doing it like many other file browsers, even windows explorer)

Leave a Reply